Da reedição de designing social inquiry à edição dos novos debates metodológicos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14244/tp.v32i00.1017Palavras-chave:
Metodologia política, Debates metodológicos, Quanti vs. Quali, Explicação causal, KKVResumo
O artigo revisita as discussões metodológicas propostas na obra de KKV por ocasião da publicação de uma nova edição de Designing Social Inquiry. Utilizo como ponto de partida a obra de KKV para analisar as discussões contemporâneas sobre causalidade, explicação e ciência. Parte-se da premissa de que a lógica inferencial de KKV projeta-se como um modelo único de produção de conhecimento, o que contrasta com a pluralidade de concepções dentro da Ciência Política e das Relações Internacionais. Recorrendo aos aportes da filosofia das ciências sociais para avaliar a obra e os debates contemporâneos em ambas disciplinas, aponto três problemáticas na obra de KKV: o problema da causalidade, o problema da explicação e o problema da unificação metodológica. A análise desses problemas evidencia a lógica de ciência que KKV projetam sobre as disciplinas de Ciência Política e RI, sintetizada em uma visão de causalidade oriunda do modelo de Rubin-Holland, centrada na explicação causal como única forma de explicação legítima, e proposta como modelo universal de produção de conhecimento.
Downloads
Referências
BELL, M. S. Examining Explanations for Nuclear Proliferation. International Studies Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 60, n. 3, p. 520–29, 2016.
BENNETT, A. Process Tracing: A Bayesian Perspective. In: BOX-STEFFENSMEIER, J. M.; BRADY, H. E.; COLLIER, D. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 702-721.
BENNETT, A. Process Tracing with Bayes: Moving Beyond the Criteria of Necessity and Sufficiency. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 46-51, 2014.
BEVIR, M. Meta-methodology: Clearing the Underbrush. In: BOX-STEFFENSMEIER, J. M.; BRADY, H. E.; COLLIER, D. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 48-70.
CARTWRIGHT, N. Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
CARTWRIGHT, N. Causal Inference. In: CARTWRIGHT, N.; MONTUSCHI, E. (org.). Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 308-326.
CARVALHO, T.; GABRIEL, J. P. N.; LOPES, D. B. ‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches. Contexto Internacional, [S. l.], v. 43, n. 3, p. 461-488, 2021.
CHATTERJEE, A. Ontology, Epistemology, and Multi-Methods. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 11-15, 2009.
CHERNOFF, F. Explanation and Progress in Security Studies: Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014a.
CHERNOFF, F. Causal Argument in IR: Regularity, Singular Cause, and Inefficient Cause. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 6-11, 2014b.
COPPEDGE, M. Speedbumps on the Road to Multi-Method Consensus in Comparative Politics. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 15-17, 2009.
DOWDING, K. The Philosophy and Methods of Political Science. Londres: Routledge, 2016.
DOWDING, K.; LENINE, E. Models, Conceptual and Predictive: A Response to Johnson’s Models-as-Fables. Perspectives on Politics, FirstView, 2020. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592721002000.
DOWDING, K.; MILLER, C. On prediction in political science. European Journal of Political Research, [S. l.], v. 58, n. 3, p. 1001-1018, 2019.
ELSTER, J. Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
GERRING, J. Qualitative Methods. Annual Review of Political Science, [S. l.], v. 20, p. 15-36, 2017.
GOEMANS, H. E. Qualitative Methods as an Essential Complement to Quantitative Methods. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 11-13, 2007.
GOERTZ, G.; MAHONEY, J. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
HAWKESWORTH, M. Contending Conceptions of Science and Politics: Methodology and the Constitution of the Political. In: YANOW, D.; SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P. (org.). Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods in the Interpretive Turn. 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, 2015. p. 27-49.
HEMPEL, C. G.; OPPENHEIM, P. Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, [S. l.], v. 15, p. 137-175, 1948.
HOLLAND, P. W. Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, [S. l.], v. 81, n. 396, p. 945-960, 1986.
ISAACS, J. C. For a More Public Political Science. Perspectives on Politics, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 269-283, 2015.
JACKSON, P. T. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. London: Routledge, 2011.
JACKSON, P. T. Making Sense of Making Sense: Configurational Analysis and the Double Hermeneutic. In: YANOW, D.; SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P. (org.). Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods in the Interpretive Turn. 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, 2015. p. 267-283.
JACKSON, P. T. Causal claims and causal explanation in international studies. Journal of International Relations and Development, [S. l.], v. 20, p. 689-716, 2017.
KELLSTEDT, P. M.; WHITTEN, G. D. Fundamentos da Pesquisa em Ciência Política. São Paulo: Blucher, 2015.
KEOHANE, R. O. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 4, p. 379-396, 1988.
KEOHANE, R. O. International Relations Theory: Contributions for a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 245-253, 1989.
KEOHANE, R. O. Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 42, p. 193-198, 1998.
KING, G. Restructuring Social Science: Reflection from Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science. PS: Political Science and Politics, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 1, p. 165-173, 2014.
KING, G.; KEOHANE, R. O.; VERBA, S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
KING, G.; KEOHANE, R. O.; VERBA, S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (New Edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.
KURKI, M. Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
KURKI, M.; SUGANAMI, H. Towards the politics of causal explanation: a reply to the critics of causal inquiries. International Theory, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 3, p. 400-429, 2012.
KRIPKE, S. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
LEBOW, R. N. Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
LENINE, E.; MÖRSCHBÄCHER, M. La iniciativa DA-RT en la ciencia política estadounidense: discursos acerca de una política de transparencia y acceso a datos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, [S. l.], v. LXIV, n. 235, p. 109-138, 2019.
LENINE, E.; MÖRSCHBÄCHER, M. Pesquisa bibliométrica e hierarquias do conhecimento em Ciência Política. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, [S. l.], v. 31, p. 123-160, 2020.
LIJPHART, A. Comparative Politics and Comparative Method. American Political Science Review, [S. l.], v. 65, n. 3, p. 682-698, 1971.
MEDEIROS, M. A.; BARNABÉ, I.; ALBUQUERQUE, R.; LIMA, R. What does the field of international relations look like in South America? Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, [S. l.], v. 59, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2016.
MONROE, K. R. (org.). Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
NICOLAU, J.; OLIVEIRA, L. Political science in Brazil: An analysis of academic articles (1966-2015). Sociologia e Antropologia, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 371-393, 2017.
PARANHOS, R; FIGUEIREDO FILHO, D. B.; ROCHA, E. C.; SILVA JÚNIOR, J. A.; FREITAS, D. Uma introdução aos métodos mistos. Sociologias, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 42, p. 384-411, 2016.
PATOMÄKI, H. How to Tell Better Stories about World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 105-133, 1996.
PATOMÄKI, H. Praxis, politics and the future: a dialectical critical realist account of world-historical causation. Journal of International Relations and Development, [S. l.], v. 20, p. 805-825, 2017.
POPPER, K. A Lógica da Pesquisa Científica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2013.
RAGIN, C. C.; RIHOUX, B. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): State of the Art and Prospects. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 3-13, 2004.
REZENDE, F. C. Fronteira de integração entre métodos quantitativos e qualitativos na Ciência Política comparada. Teoria & Sociedade, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 40-74, 2014.
RIHOUX, B. Case-oriented Configurational Research: Qualitative Comparative Analyss (QCA), Fuzzy Sets, and Related Techniques. In: BOX-STEFFENSMEIER, J. M.; BRADY, H. E.; COLLIER, D. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 722-736.
SOARES, G. A. D. O calcanhar metodológico da ciência política no Brasil. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, [S. l.], v. 48, p. 27-52, 2005.
SUGANAMI, H. On the Causes of War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
SUGANAMI, H. Narrative Explanation and International Relations: Back to Basics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, [S. l.], v. 37, n. 2, p. 327-356, 2008.
SCHWARTZSHEA, P.; YANOW, D. Legitimizing Political Science or Splitting the Discipline? Reflections on DA-RT and the Policy-making Role of a Professional Association. Politics & Gender, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. e11, 2016.
SILVA, G. P. Desafios ontológicos e epistemológicos para os métodos mistos na Ciência Política. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 88, p. 115-129, 2015.
TAHKO, T. E. Unity of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
YANOW, D. Thinking Interpretively: Philosophical Pressupositions and the Human Sciences. In: YANOW, D.; SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P. (org.). Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods in the Interpretive Turn. 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, 2015. p. 5-26.
YLIKOSKI, P. Micro, Macro, and Mechanisms. In: KINCAID, H. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 21-45.
WALDNER, D. Process Tracing and Causal Mechanisms. In: KINCAID, H. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 65-84.
WIGHT, C. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
WINCH, P. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. Londres: Routledge, 2008.
WINTER, P.; LENINE, E. Survival of the best fit: modelling nuclear proliferation. International Interactions, [S. l.], v. 46, n. 5, p. 832-845, 2020.
WITTENBERG, J. Peril and Promise: Multi-Method Research in Practice. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 19-22, 2007.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Investigações Filosóficas. 9. ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Ed. Vozes, 2014.
