Economic Voting And Brazilian Soy
A Valence, Position And Patrimony Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14244/tp.v33i00.1115Keywords:
Economic voting, Soy, Brazil, AgribusinessAbstract
This article investigates the effects of economic voting in Brazilian soy-producing municipalities since the turn of the 21st century. It does so by adopting an expanded approach toward economic voting, incorporating not only valence economic voting - voters’ perception of the economy as either good or bad - but also position and patrimony economic voting, that is, analyzing how public policy preferences and asset ownership affect voters’ evaluations of incumbents. In this sense, the article examines how environmental and land policies, two issues that have been especially contentious in Brazilian agribusiness, have impacted behavior at the ballot box. To accomplish its goals, the study relies on a novel dataset that contains information on all 2387 Brazilian soy-producing municipalities, which comprise nearly half of the total of Brazilian cities, and it uses a fixed-effect panel data model. Results confirm the significance of all three kinds of economic voting. Higher soy prices do favor incumbents, while agrarian reform policies harm incumbents’ chances of reelection. Interestingly, soy-producing municipalities have rewarded pro-environment policies since the mid-2000s, contrary to the expectations of the traditional narrative regarding agribusiness.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, R. D. Bolsonaro presidente: conservadorismo, evangelismo e a crise brasileira. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, v. 38, p. 185–213, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25091/S01013300201900010010. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024.
ASHWORTH, S. Electoral accountability: recent theoretical and empirical work. Annual Review of Political Science, v. 15, n. 1, p. 183–201, 2012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-103823. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-103823
BARROS, C. R. de. PT, uma história. 1. ed. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2022.
BENTON, A. L. Dissatisfied democrats or retrospective voters?: economic hardship, political institutions, and voting behavior in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, v. 38, n. 4, p. 417–442, 2005. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273856. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273856
BRATTON, K. A. Retrospective voting and future expectations: the case of the budget deficit in the 1988 election. American Politics Quarterly, v. 22, n. 3, p. 277–296, 1994. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9402200302. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9402200302
BRUNO, R. Elites agrárias, patronato rural e bancada ruralista. Observatório de Políticas Públicas para a Agricultura, n. 9, p. 23, 2015.
BUTLER, D.; Stokes, D. E. Political change in Britain: forces shaping electoral choice. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1969.
CAMPELLO, D.; Urdinez, F. Voter and legislator responses to localized trade shocks from China in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, v. 54, n. 7, p. 1131–1162, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020970233. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020970233
CAMPELLO, D.; Zucco, C. Presidential success and the world economy. The Journal of Politics, v. 78, n. 2, p. 589–602, 2016. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/684749. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/684749
CAMPELLO, D.; Zucco, C. Commodity price shocks and misattribution of responsibility for the economy: observational and experimental evidence. 2018. Available at: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:80/dspace/handle/10438/27684. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024.
CATTELAN, R.; MoraeS, M. L. de; ROSSONI, R. A. A reforma agrária nos ciclos políticos do Brasil (1995–2019). Revista Nera, v. 23, n. 55, p. 27, 2020.
DESEMPENHO DAS EXPORTAÇÃO DO AGRONEGÓCIO. Centro De Estudos Avançados Em Economia Aplicada, USP. 2021. Available at: https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/br/indices-de-exportacao-do-agronegocio.aspx. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024.
COMEX STAT. Ministério da Economia. 2022. Available at: http://comexstat.mdic.gov.br/pt/geral. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024.
COOPER, J.; KIM, S. E.; URPELAINEN, J. The broad impact of a narrow conflict: how natural resource windfalls shape policy and politics. The Journal of Politics, v. 80, n. 2, p. 630–646, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/694787. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/694787
COSTA, S. H. G. A questão agrária no Brasil e a bancada ruralista no congresso nacional. 2012. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia Humana) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11606/D.8.2012.tde-08012013-143125. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/D.8.2012.tde-08012013-143125
DASGUPTA, A.; RAMIREZ, E. R. Explaining rural conservatism: political consequences of technological change in the great plains. 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/75brz. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/75brz
DUCH, R. M.; STEVENSON, R. T. The economic vote: how political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755934. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755934
ESCHER, F.; WILKINSON, J. A economia política do complexo soja-carne Brasil-China. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 57, p. 656–678, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2019.191017. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2019.191017
FAUSTO, B. História do Brasil. 14. ed. São Paulo: Edusp, 2019.
FEDASEYEU, V.; GILJE, E.; STRAHAN, P. E. Technology, economic booms, and politics: evidence from fracking. 2019. SSRN Scholarly Paper 2698157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2698157. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2698157
FERNANDES, M. J. C. Da luta pela terra à luta pela reforma agrária no Brasil. Revista GeoInterações, v. 1, n. 1, 2017.
FILIPPE, M. Preocupação dos brasileiros com o planeta afeta consumo e 73% estão mudando para opções sustentáveis. Exame, 21 nov. 2023. Available at: https://exame.com/esg/preocupacao-dos-brasileiros-com-o-planeta-afeta-consumo-e-73-estao-mudando-para-opcoes-sustentaveis/. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024.
GARCIA, R. Desmatamento é maior preocupação ambiental entre brasileiros, mostra pesquisa GLOBO/Ipec. O Globo, 25 sep. 2022. Available at: https://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/meio-ambiente/noticia/2022/09/desmatamento-e-maior-preocupacao-ambiental-entre-brasileiros-mostra-pesquisa-globoipec.ghtml. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024.
GÉLINEAU, F. Presidents, political context, and economic accountability: evidence from Latin America. Political Research Quarterly, v. 60, n. 3, p. 415–428, 2007. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907304109. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907304109
HEALY, A.; LENZ, G. S. Substituting the end for the whole: why voters respond primarily to the election-year economy. American Journal of Political Science, v. 58, n. 1, p. 31–47, 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12053. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12053
HEALY, A.; MALHOTRA, N. Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science, v. 16, n. 1, p. 285–306, 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212920. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212920
HELLWIG, T. Globalization and mass politics: retaining the room to maneuver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871464
HELLWIG, T.; MCALLISTER, I. Party positions, asset ownership, and economic voting. Political Studies, v. 67, n. 4, p. 912–931, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718815781. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718815781
HUNTER, W.; POWER, T. J. Bolsonaro and Brazil’s illiberal backlash. Journal of Democracy, v. 30, n. 1, p. 68–82, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0005. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0005
JANK, M. S.; GUO, P.; MIRANDA, S. H. G. De. Partnership on agriculture and food security. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2020.
JENKINS, R. Is Chinese competition causing deindustrialization in Brazil? Latin American Perspectives, v. 42, n. 6, p. 42–63, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15593553. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15593553
Johnson, G. B.; SCHWINDT-BAYER, L. A. Economic accountability in Central America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, v. 1, n. 3, p. 33–56, 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X0900100302. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X0900100302
KINDER, D. R.; KIEWIET, D. R. Sociotropic politics: the American case. British Journal of Political Science, v. 11, n. 2, p. 129–161, 1981. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002544. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002544
KRAMER, G. H. Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964. The American Political Science Review, v. 65, n. 1, p. 131–143, 1971. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1955049. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1955049
LACERDA, M. B. Neoconservadorismo de periferia: articulação familista, punitivista e neoliberal na Câmara dos Deputados. 2018. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
LEWIS-BECK, M.; RATTO, M. C. Economic voting in Latin America: a general model. Electoral Studies, v. 32, n. 3, p. 489–493, 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.023. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.023
LEWIS-BECK, M. S.; NADEAU, R. Economic voting theory: testing new dimensions. Electoral Studies, v. 30, n. 2, p. 288–294, 2011. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.001. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.001
LEWIS-BECK, M.; STEGMAIER, M. The economic vote in transitional democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, v. 18, p. 303–323, 2008. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802227710. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802227710
MANGONNET, J.; MURILLO, M. V.; RUBIO, J. M. Local economic voting and the agricultural boom in Argentina, 2007–2015. Latin American Politics and Society, v. 60, n. 3, p. 27–53, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2018.23. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2018.23
MANSFIELD, E. D.; MUTZ, D. C. Support for free trade: self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, v. 63, n. 3, p. 425–457, 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158. Accessed in: 27 sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158
MORCEIRO, P.; TOLEDO, V. Blog Valor Adicionado. 25 jan. 2023. Available at: https://valoradicionado.wordpress.com/. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024.
MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS NA PERCEPÇÃO DOS BRASILEIROS 2022. Instituto de Tecnologia e Sociedade do Rio; Yale Program on Climate Change Communication; Instituto de Pesquisa e Consultoria Estratégica. 2023.
NADEAU, R.; LEWIS-BECK, M. S.; BÉLANGER, É. Economics and elections revisited. Comparative Political Studies, v. 46, n. 5, p. 551–573, 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463877. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463877
NEZI, R.; KATSANIDOU, A. From valence to position: Economic voting in extraordinary conditions. Acta Politica, v. 49, n. 4, p. 413–430, 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.14. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.14
NOVAES, L. M.; SCHIUMERINI, L. Commodity shocks and incumbency effects. British Journal of Political Science, v. 52, n. 4, p. 1689–1708, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000478. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000478
PASSADOR, C. Agronegócio, fascismo e eleição. Jornal da USP, 1 sep. 2022. Available at: https://jornal.usp.br/articulistas/claudia-souza-passador/agronegocio-fascismo-e-eleicao/. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024.
POMPEIA, C. Formação política do agronegócio. São Paulo: Elefante Editora, 2021.
POMPEIA, C. O agrobolsonarismo. Revista Piauí, n. 184, jan. 2022. Available at: https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/materia/o-agrobolsonarismo/. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024.
PORTO, A.; LODOLA, A. Economic policy and electoral outcomes. Journal of Applied Economics, v. 16, n. 2, p. 333–356, 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(13)60014-8. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(13)60014-8
QUINLAN, S.; OKOLIKJ, M. Patrimonial economic voting: A cross-national analysis of asset ownership and the vote. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, v. 32, n. 1, p. 193–213, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1655758. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1655758
QUINN, D. P.; SATTLER, T.; WEYMOUTH, S. Do exchange rates influence voting? Evidence from elections and survey experiments in democracies. International Organization, v. 77, n. 4, p. 789–823, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832300022X. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832300022X
RAJÃO, R.; SOARES- FILHO, B.; NUNES, F.; BÖRNER, J.; MACHADO, L.; ASSIS, D.; OLIVEIRA, A.; PINTO, L.; RIBEIRO, V.; RAUSCH, L.; GIBBS, H.; FIGUEIRA, D. The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness. Science, v. 369, n. 6501, p. 246–248, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6646. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6646
RATTO, M. C. El proceso de atribución de responsabilidades en América Latina: Un estudio sobre el voto económico entre 1996 y 2004. Revista SAAP, v. 5, n. 1, p. 59–92, 2011.
REIS, D. A. Modernização, ditadura e democracia: 1964-2010. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2014.
REMMER, K. L. The political impact of economic crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. The American Political Science Review, v. 85, n. 3, p. 777–800, 1991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1963850. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1963850
SAMUELS, D. Presidentialism and accountability for the economy in comparative perspective. The American Political Science Review, v. 98, n. 3, p. 425–436, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540400125X
SANTORO, M. The Dragon and the Captain: China in the perspective of Brazil’s nationalist right. Geosul, v. 35, n. 77, p. 258–269, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-5230.2020v35n77p258. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-5230.2020v35n77p258
SEVÁ, J. T. A mão que afaga é a mesma que apedreja: Preservando a natureza que é possível! Propriedade da terra, classes dominantes e representação política no Brasil contemporâneo - a reforma do Código Florestal Brasileiro de 1965. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica. Available at: https://tede.ufrrj.br/handle/jspui/1293. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024.
VALDINI, M. E.; LEWIS-BECK, M. S. Economic voting in Latin America: Rules and responsibility. American Journal of Political Science, v. 62, n. 2, p. 410–423, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12339. Accessed in: 27 Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12339
VIGNA, E. Bancada ruralista: Um grupo de interesse. Argumento, n. 8, p. 1–52, 2001